Mariia Moklytsia’s communicative theory as a method of analysis of modern literary work

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2025.2.1

Keywords:

psychoanalysis, communication, individuation, modernism, image, symbol, allegory

Abstract

The subject of the study is the philosophical, psychological, and aesthetic features of the author’s method of the scholar and writer Mariia Moklytsia, which was first used in the process of analysis and then in her own creation of modern literature. The basis of the research at the first level is also the academic works of the subject of the study, the author of “Modernism as Structure. Philosophy. Psychology. Poetics” (1998, 2002), “Fundamentals of Literary Studies” (2002), “Introduction to Literary Studies” (2011), “Aesthetics of Lesia Ukrainka” (2011), “Allegorical Code of Literature” (2017), “Modernism in Ukrainian Literature of the 20th Century” (2017), monograph “Lesia Ukrainka. Deconstruction of Readings” (2022), etc. At the next level (a cradle for M. Moklytsia herself), there are the works of the founder of analytical psychology Carl Gustav Jung (“Analytical Psychology”, “On the Relation of Analytical Psychology to Works of Fiction”, “Synchronicity”, “Psychological Types”, “Psychology and Alchemy”). The purpose of the study is to comprehensively study the literary and artistic works of Mariia Moklytsia in the context of her own inventions and innovations (with a strong emphasis on controversial issues). A review of the resources of scientometric databases allows us to state that the novelty of the study is determined by the subject (the scientist’s work) and the comprehensive approach taken in studying it. The study uses general scientific methods, as well as methods of analytical psychology.

As a result of the study, it was found that at the origins of Mariia Moklytsia’s scientific and artistic activity, she developed from a detailed study of the properties of artistic means to their use as markers of a certain type of fiction writers and the direction and style of their work. In the end, it came down to reflection: the implementation of the coined concepts in her creative writing. In our opinion, the invisible goal of all these ‘experiments’ is the search for the Self (individuation), and the process resulted in the structuring and deconstruction of the achievements of the creators of modernism (in the manifestation of dominant literary trends, methods, and styles). Anthropological philosophy and analytical psychology (mainly in the interpretation of Carl Gustav Jung) became a guiding light on the path of her relentless search.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Oksana Kosiuk, Lesya Ukrainka Volyn National University

PhD of Philology, Associate Professor of the Department of Social Communications

References

Chiurlonis, M. (2024). Tvory [Works]. WikiArt. Entsyklopediia vizualnykh mystetstv. https://www.wikiart.org/uk/mikaloyus-chyurlonis/all-works/text-list

Jervolino, D. (1990). Living Metaphor. In The Cogito and Hermeneutics: The Question of the Subject in Ricoeur (pp. 103–113). Contributions to Phenomenology, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0639-6_13

Jung, C. G. (1923). Psychological Types. Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner & Co., Ltd.

Jung, C. G. (1978). On the relation of analytical psychology to poetry. Essay from: The Spirit in Man, Art and Literature. http://studiocleo.com/librarie/jung/essay.html

Jung, C. G. (2024). Psychology and Alchemy [Audiobook]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TAipRw36Shs

Kosiuk, O., Kosheliuk, O. (Eds.) (2017). Hra v biser: komunikatsiini ihry suchasnosti [The glass bead game: modern communication games]. Vezha-Druk.

Moklytsia, M. (1998). Modernizm yak struktura: Filosofiia. Psykholohiia. Poetyka [Modernism as a structure: Philosophy. Psychology. Poetics]. Vydavnytstvo Volynskoho derzhavnoho universytetu im. Lesi Ukrainky.

Moklytsia, M. (2004). Silska topoHnomika: Poezii u zhanri ihrek [Rural topoGnomics: Poems in the Y Genre]. Vezha.

Moklytsia, M. (2011a). Vstup do literaturoznavstva [Introduction to Literary Studies]. Volynskyi natsionalnyi universytet im. Lesi Ukrainky.

Moklytsia, M. (2011b). Estetyka Lesi Ukrainky (kontekst yevropeiskoho modernizmu) [Lesia Ukrainka’s aesthetics (Context of European modernism)]. Volynskyi natsionalnyi universytet im. Lesi Ukrainky.

Moklytsia, M. (2016). Sezonna hrafika: poeziia, hrafika [Seasonal graphics: poetry, graphics]. Vezha-Druk.

Moklytsia, M. (2017). Alehorychnyi kod literatury, abo Reabilitatsiia alehorii tryvaie [The allegorical code of literature, or The rehabilitation of allegory continues]. Kondor.

Moklytsia, M. (2019). Try skhodynky, piat svichok [Three steps, five candles]. Ukrainskyi priorytet.

Moklytsia, M. (2021). Obakon, rozchaklovuvach sliv [Obakon, the dispeller of words]. Ukrainskyi priorytet.

Moklytsia, M. (2022). Lesia Ukrainka: dekonstruktsiia prochytan [Lesia Ukrainka: deconstruction of readings]. Kondor.

Sait Nivroku (2023, June 5). Hipermodern i “Volynskyi tekst” (novi romany Vasylia Slapchuka i Marii Moklytsi) [Hypermodern and the “Volyn Text” (new novels by Vasyl Slapchuk and Maria Moklytsa)] [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3ext0qnxOrY

Sait Nivroku (2024). Studentstvo VNU imeni Lesi Ukrainky vkotre zustrilosia z oryhinalnymy volynskymy pysmennykamy [Students of Lesya Ukrainka National University once again met with original Volyn writers] [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MrLoLFu8GUo&t=58s

Downloads


Abstract views: 326

Published

30.06.2025

How to Cite

Kosiuk, O. (2025). Mariia Moklytsia’s communicative theory as a method of analysis of modern literary work. Synopsis: Text, Context, Media, 31(2), 70–78. https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2025.2.1

Issue

Section

Practices of text interpretation