Types of satire interpretation in British media discourse
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2021.2.6Keywords:
satire, relevance theory, contextual sources, satirical interpretation, satirical intentionsAbstract
The Subject of the Study is types of satire interpretation in British media discourse. The material for the research includes texts from British satirical magazine Private Eye (2020) covering articles on social and political topics. The aim of the survey is to identity types of satire interpretation based on the order of activation of contextual sources in British media discourse. To achieve the aim, the method of discourse analysis and functional pragmatic analysis were applied. As a result of the study based on relevance theory the role of context in satire interpretation was determined and the characteristics of six contextual sources the reader resorts to while interpreting satire in British printed media were established. The study claims that in some cases several contextual sources are activated simultaneously on different stages of satire interpretation, i.e. in disambiguation and in derivation of implicated premises and conclusions to yield both explicatures and implicatures. The research establishes that contextual information helps to simplify the process of satirical intentions identification, thus saving cognitive effort and increasing contextual effect in the process of satire interpretation. Taking into account the order of activation of contextual sources and the nature of interaction of context and explicitly expressed information, the study singles out four types of satire interpretation in British media discourse: a) fast satirical interpretation when satirical intentions are made vivid at the beginning of satire interpretation; b) satirical interpretation in which satirical intentions become manifest in the middle of interpretation process; c) satirical interpretation and explicit interpretation occur simultaneously; d) satirical interpretation becomes obvious only at the end of interpretation. Further research in this direction could be done in identification of prototypical types of satire interpretation in media discourse and impact of these types of interpretation on cognitive effect of satirical utterances.
Downloads
References
Cap, P. & Dynel, M. (2017). Implicitness: From Lexis to Discourse. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.276
Gibbs, R. (2007). On the psycholinguistics of sarcasm. In: R. W. Gibbs, & H. L. Colston (Eds.). Irony in language and thought: A cognitive science reader. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.1075/pbns.276
Simpson, P. (2003). On the discourse of satire: Toward a stylistic model of satirical humor. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/lal.2
Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986/1995) Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Blackwell.
Sperber, D., Clément, F., Heintz, C., Mascaro, O., Mercier, H., Origgi, G., & Wilson, D. (2010). Epistemic vigilance. Mind & Language, 25(4), 359–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0017.2010.01394.x
Velykoroda, Yu. (2012). Pretsedentni fenomeny v amerykanskomu mediinomu dyskursi (na materiali chasopysiv “Time” ta “Newsweek”). (Thesis of PhD in Philology, Ivan Franko National Univesity of Lviv).
Wilson, D. & Sperber, D. (2004). Relevance theory (pp. 607–632). In: L. Horn, and G. Ward (eds). The Handbook of Pragmatics. Blackwell.
Wilson, D. (1992). Reference and Relevance. Working Papers in Linguistics, 4, 165–191.
Wilson, D. (2009) Irony and metarepresentation. Working Papers in Linguistics, 21, 183–226.
Yurchyshyn, V. (2020). Kharakteryzatsiia kontekstualnoi informatsii ta yii rol pid chas interpretatsii satyry. Suchasni doslidzhennia z linhvistyky, literaturoznavstva i mizhkulturnoi komunikatsii: materialy V vseukrainskoi naukovo-praktychnoi konferentsii ELLIC 2020, 107–109.
Yus, F. (2016). Humour and Relevance. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/thr.4
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Vita Yurchyshyn
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
