Genre dominant of whimsical prose

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2019.1.3

Keywords:

whimsical prose, genre dominant, artistic convention (artistic invention), carnivalization, grotesque, parodying

Abstract

Similarity of parameters of intellectual, parable and whimsical prose demands the definition of their genre dominant – differential marker characteristics that clearly distinguish between these related (but especial) genres. That is why the purpose of the paper is to substantiate the concept of genre dominant of whimsical prose. There is an urgent need to clarify controversial genre definitions of some prose works, which still cause attention of researchers. It is emphasized that whimsical prose is a separate genre, along with a parable, intellectual, folklore-mythological, etc. Therefore, these terms are not interchangeable. So it is needed to remove parallel genre definitions of prose works. The Research Novelty is a proposition to consider secondary artistic convention (artistic invention) and comic strategy as the genre dominant of whimsical prose. It has been observed that the convention may be in content (supernatural elements), in stylistic and in the structure of the text (conceptual, characterological, situational and conventional manner of the narrative). The role of comic strategy in whimsical genre is considered. The text-building factors – carnivalization, grotesque and parodying are observed. It was found out that they expressed the key semantic of whimsical prose, which is consider to be the resistance to the patterns of socialistic realism. According to socio-historic situation, direct cultural discussion – both theoretical and by means of using alternative writing strategies was impossible. As a conclusion, the ambivalent strategy of carnival as a legitimized space for creative invention, the grotesque revival of literary stamps and the subversive potential of the parody has been chosen as the most appropriate way of updating Ukrainian literature and fighting for its artistic value. The proposed criteria give the opportunity to substantiate scientifically the corpus of whimsical prose texts, which makes the practical value of work.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Olena Voshchenko, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University

аспірант

References

Hromiak, R., & Kovaliv, Yu. et al. (2007). Literaturoznavchyi slovnyk-dovidnyk [Literary dictionary]. Kyiv: Akademiia.

Kobylko, N. (2017). Mifolohema “doroha” v ukrainskomu literaturnomu dyskursi (na materiali tvoriv khymernoi prozy) [The “trip” mythologeme in the scope of Ukrainian literature discourse (based on chimerical prose opuses matter)]. (Abstract of doctoral dissertation, Berdiansk State Pedagogical University, Berdiansk, Ukraine).

Kolodii, O. (1999). Prytcha i prytchevist v ukrainskii prozi 70–80 rokiv XX st. [Parabola and parabolality in Ukrainian prose of 70-80-th of the 20th century]. (Doctoral dissertation, Ternopil Volodymyr Hnatiuk National Pedagogical University, Ternopil, Ukraine).

Kovaliv, Yu. (Ed.). (2007). Literaturoznavcha entsyklopediia [Literary encyclopedia] (Vols. 1–2). Kyiv: Akademiia.

Kozachuk, N. (2007). Poetyka ukrainskoi intelektualnoi prozy 1960–90 rr. [Poetics of the Ukrainian Intellectual Prose of the 1960-1990s]. (Doctoral dissertation, Yuriy Fedkovych Chernivtsi National University, Chernivtsi, Ukraine).

Kravchenko, A. (1988). Khudozhnia umovnist v ukrainskii radianskii prozi [Artistic conditionality in the Ukrainian Soviet prose]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka.

Kurylenko, D. (2017). Zhanrovo-stylova polifoniia prozy kin. 50–70 rr. XX st. (na prykladi romanu O. Ilchenka “Kozatskomu rodu nema perevodu, abo zh Mamai i Chuzha Molodytsia”, dylohii V. Zemliaka “Lebedyna zghraia” ta “Zeleni Mlyny”) [Genre and stylistic polyphony of the prose of the late 50-70's of the ХХ cent. (on the example of O. Ilchenko's novels “There is no end of the Cossack family, or Mamay and Alien Moloditsa”, V. Zemlyak’s “Swan Flock” and “Green Mills”)]. (Doctoral dissertation, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine).

Maidachenko, P. (1991). Komichne v suchasnii ukrainskii prozi [Comic in contemporary Ukrainian prose]. Kyiv: Dnipro.

Naienko, M. (2012). Khudozhnia literatura Ukrainy. Vid mifiv do modernoi realnosti [Fiction of Ukraine. From myths to modern reality]. Kyiv: Prosvita.

Pavlyshyn, M. (1997). Kanon ta ikonostas. Literaturno-krytychni statti [Canon and iconostasis. Literary critiques]. Kyiv: Chas.

Pidopryhora, S. (2018). Ukrainska eksperymentalna proza XX – pochatku XXI stolit: «nemozhlyva» literatura [Ukrainian experimental prose of XX – the beginning of the XXI centuries: “impossible” literature]. Mykolaiv: Ilion.

Pogribnyj, A. (1980). Moda? Novatsyia? Zakonomernost? [Fashion? Novation? Regularity?] Lyteraturnoe obozrenye, 2, 24–28.

Shton, H. (1998). Dukhovnyi prostir ukrainskoi liro-epichnoi prozy [Spiritual space of Ukrainian lyric-epic prose]. Kyiv: Ukrainska knyha.

Tkachenko, A. (2003). Mystetstvo slova. Vstup do literaturoznavstva [The Art of the word: Introduction to literary studies] (2nd ed.). Kyiv: Kyivskyi universytet.

Tomashevskij, B. (1996). Teorija litteratury. Pojetika [Literary theory. Poetics]. Moscow: Aspekt-press.

Zborovska, N. (2006). Kod ukrainskoi literatury. Proekt psykhoistorii novitnoi ukrainskoi literatury [Ukrainian literature code. Project of psychohistory of modern Ukrainian literature]. Kyiv: Akamdevydav.

Zemliak, V. (1977). Lebedyna zghraia. Zeleni Mlyny [Swan flock. Green Mills]. Kyiv: Radianskyi pysmennyk.

Zhuravska, O. (2018). Dykhotomiia “realnoho” y “irrealnoho” khronotopu yak katehorialna zhanrova oznaka ukrainskoho khymernoho romanu 2 polovyny XX st. [The dichotomy of a “real” and “unreal” chronotopes as a genre category of the Ukrainian whimsical novel of the 2nd half of the 20th century]. (Doctoral dissertation, Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University, Kyiv, Ukraine).

Downloads


Abstract views: 431

Published

31.03.2019

How to Cite

Voshchenko, O. (2019). Genre dominant of whimsical prose. Synopsis: Text, Context, Media, 25(1), 16–22. https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259x.2019.1.3

Issue

Section

Theoretical horizons of Literary Studies