HISTORICAL PARADIGM OF SEMIOTICS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.28925/2311-259X.2017(2)8122Keywords:
semiotics, sign, semasiology, sign process, paradigmAbstract
The article analyses the theoretical basis and development trends of the semiotics in literary critics. It characterizes the scope of definitions of semiotics as the science about the semiotic system, common characteristics of semiotic systems, general theories of signs and systems. It is noted that because of semiotics popularity people not always engage research activities in this realm correctly, and there is excess use of its terms, which arouse concern among scientists. The article outlines the genesis of the sign theory itself, defines timeline and specificity of semiotics as a science, and designates its establishers, whose researches define the polarity in the approach to semiotics. It considers the primary gazes of the representatives’ of variant critical currents which had become a subject of strong support from ones and intense critics from others. The attention is focused on the researches of the 1950–1990’s in XX century by both national and foreign authors, which outline the topics of usage of the structural and semiotic methods in the study of literature.Downloads
References
REFERENCES (TRANSLITERATED)
Deely J. The Impact of Semiotics to Philosophy. Helsinki, 2000. – Р. 23. – (In English).
Encyclopedic dictionary of semiotics / Gen. ed. T.Sebeok. – In 3 vol. – Vol.1: A – M. – Vol.2: N – Z. – Vol.3: Bibliography. – Berlin, etc.: Mouton De Gruyter, cop. 1986. – 592 p., 593 p., 452 p. – (In English).
Hawkes T. Structuralism and semiotics. – London, Berkeley: University of California press, 1977. – 192 p. – (In English).
Ryder M. Semiotics: Language and Culture. In: Encyclopedia of Science, Technology, and Ethics. Copyright © 2001–2006 by Macmillan Reference USA, an imprint of the Gale Group. – (In English).
Avgustin A. O Troice: v pjatnadcati knigah protiv arian. Krasnodar: Glagol, 2004. – p. 363. – (In Russian).
Aristotel. Ob istolkovanii, 16a3-5 // Aristotel. Sochinenija v chetyreh tomah. Vol.2. Moskva: Mysl, 1978. – p. 252. – (In Russian).
Lokk Dzh. Opyt o chelovecheskom razume. Vol. 1. Moskva: Socjegiz, 1960. – p. 695. – (In Russian).
Novaja filosofskaja jenciklopedija. V chetyreh tomah. / In-t filosofii RAN. Nauchno-red. sovet: V.S. Stepin, A.A. Gusejnov, G.Ju. Semigin. M., Mysl, 2010, Vol. II, E – M,. – p. 613. – (In Russian).
Sekst Je. Sochinenija v dvuh tomah. Vol.1. Moskva: Mysl, 1976. – pp. 179–280. – (In Russian).
Skripnik K.D. Semiotika: glossarij kljuchevyh terminov. Rostov n/D, 2010. – p. 150. – (In Russian).
Sosjur F. de Trudy po jazykoznaniju. Moskva: Progress, 1977. – p. 54. – (In Russian).
Jakobson R. Semiotika. Moskva: Raduga, 1983. – p. 102. – (In Russian).
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
